Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Apple Vs Motorola Mobility: U.S. Judge Dismisses Apple Patent ...

A court case brought by Apple against Google-owned Motorola Mobility for seeking what Apple argues are excessive royalties for standards-essential patents has been dismissed by the judge in a?Madison, Wisconsin federal court. It?s another small blow for Apple in its legal war against Android. The patents in question are among the 17,000 acquired by Google when it bought Motorola Mobility last year?? to bolster Android against legal attacks.

According to the?BBC,?Motorola sought 2.25 percent of the price of Apple products that use some of its patents ? but Apple was only prepared to pay $1 per device.

Being standards-essential, the patents in question must be licensed by Motorola under FRAND (fair and non-discriminatory)?terms, however determining a fair price to license a patent can be difficult. The BBC quotes Frost & Sullivan analyst?Andrew Milroy saying:??It is very tough to determine what a fair price is of any patent held by a firm.?There are complex financial models that are used to evaluate it ? but there is a lot of subjectivity and assumption that goes into those.?It can hardly be described as a science.?

Detailing why the case was dismissed,?Reuters notes that?late last week the District Judge at the court, Judge Barbara Crabb, questioned whether she had the legal authority to hear Apple?s claims, and late yesterday dismissed the case with prejudice.?Apple filed a legal brief after Crabb?s ruling, arguing that the judge does have the authority to hear its claims ? in the hopes of persuading Crabb to reconsider the ruling. If this fails, Apple?s options are limited ??FOSS Patents?notes it can appeal the ruling but can?t refile the case in another U.S. district court.

The reason for the judge?s dismissal of the case appears to be Apple taking up a position last week that it would not consider itself bound by her FRAND rate if it exceeded $1 per product. Reuters reports that, given Apple?s position, Crabb ?questioned whether she had the power to issue merely an advisory opinion? ? quoting a statement from the judge last week in which she wrote: ?It has become clear that Apple?s interest in a license is qualified.?

FOSS Patents? Florian Mueller adds

I think Apple missed an opportunity to make important headway against Motorola Mobility. I don?t know Judge Crabb and I didn?t attend any of the hearings, but I read her orders and I really thought she was very solution-oriented. In fact, I thought she would have been a great judge to preside over a FRAND rate-setting trial ? a judge that I think an implementer of FRAND standards could really have trusted to arrive at a fair decision. As long as she considered Apple to be genuinely interested in a solution, as opposed to protracted litigation, she was definitely willing to help put an end to Motorola?s wireless SEP assertions against Apple. But when she started to doubt Apple?s intentions, the case fell apart.

After the dismissal, Motorola said it is still open to negotiations with Apple, providing the following statement to news outlets:??Motorola has long offered licensing to our extensive patent portfolio at a reasonable and non-discriminatory rate in line with industry standards.?

Lea Shaver, an intellectual property professor at Indiana University School of Law, is also quoted commenting on the case: ?This puts Apple back into the position it was before.?


April 1, 1976

NASDAQ:AAPL

Started by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne, Apple has expanded from computers to consumer electronics over the last 30 years, officially changing their name from Apple Computer, Inc. to Apple, Inc. in January 2007. Among the key offerings from Apple?s product line are: Pro line laptops (MacBook Pro) and desktops (Mac Pro), consumer line laptops (MacBook Air) and desktops (iMac), servers (Xserve), Apple TV, the Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server operating systems, the iPod, the...

? Learn more

Motorola is known around the world for innovation in communications and is focused on advancing the way the world connects. From broadband communications infrastructure, enterprise mobility and public safety solutions to mobile and wireline digital communication devices that provide compelling experiences, Motorola is leading the next wave of innovations that enable people, enterprises and governments to be more connected and more mobile. Motorola (NYSE: MOT) had sales of US $22 billion in 2009

? Learn more

September 7, 1998

NASDAQ:GOOG

Google provides search and advertising services, which together aim to organize and monetize the world?s information. In addition to its dominant search engine, it offers a plethora of online tools and platforms including: Gmail, Maps, YouTube, and Google+, the company?s extension into the social space. Most of its Web-based products are free, funded by Google?s highly integrated online advertising platforms AdWords and AdSense. Google promotes the idea that advertising should be highly targeted and relevant to users thus providing...

? Learn more

Source: http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/06/apple-vs-motorola-mobility-u-s-judge-dismisses-apple-patent-licensing-lawsuit/

oakland shooting mega millions winning numbers autism speaks ubaldo jimenez ncaa final country music awards autism awareness

No comments:

Post a Comment